Meet the New Maverick

She’s progressive, she’s controversial… and she’s John McCain’s daughter?

Meet Meghan McCain, the young woman who has been stirring up the Republican cauldron with her media slams about the GOP, going as far as calling herself the poster child of moderate Republicans.

But her views on a number of policies are so anti-Republican that I have to wonder if McCain joined the party for the specific purpose of shifting the spotlight from her father to herself. The 25-year old, who was registered as an Independent from 2002 to 2008, now describes herself as a “Republican who is liberal on social issues.” (This description is also known as a Libertarian, but that’s beside the point.)

McCain says she grew to love the GOP after meeting some of the greatest minds in the party while campaigning with her father for two and a half years. She wrote on her blog, the McCainBlogette (which began as a diary of the campaign trail and ended with serious tattoo contemplations), that she joined “as a symbol of my commitment to my dad and to represent the faith I have in his ability to be an effective leader for our country and to grow and strengthen the Republican Party when he is elected President of the United States.”

Joining a political party as a symbol of family pride and loyalty is probably not the best reason to get on board, especially when you disagree with the majority of that party’s views.

And furthermore, how could anyone have grown to love the GOP at all throughout John McCain’s crusade for presidency? It was by far one of the strangest, low-blowing, desperate times in the party’s desire for power (present day happenings excluded).

My thought is this: Meghan McCain joined the Republican Party at the end of the presidential campaign for the primary purpose of demonstrating loyalty to her father, and after it was over and old John went back to his Senate seat, she realized that she was in a German kitchen making Japanese food.

But she took on an opportunity to amplify her exposure since her father was stepping out of the limelight. So she started talking publicly like a liberal, calling herself a new kind of Republican.

The result: the media paid attention – lots of attention. McCain got a job as a columnist at the Daily Beast, contributed to Newsweek, and even sat alongside Barbara Walters and company a few times on The View. She stopped updating the McCainBlogette and started an unhealthy obsession with Twitter.

Perhaps the most memorable of McCain’s tweets was the picture upload that resulted in a whole lot of ruckus and days of wasted news. The photo, if you have not seen it, is a fleshy web cam shot in which she is busting, literally, out of her shirt with a promiscuous look on her face. The caption read something about being a dork and staying in, and McCain assured the media that she was unaware the photo would solicit such a response.

Oh, please. I am a woman. McCain knew exactly what she was doing when she posted the picture, and she knew the response she would get.

I do not think that Meghan McCain deserves media attention, let alone an outlet like the Daily Beast to make inane statements and then call herself pioneering and controversial. I do not think that she deserves to be called a political commentator simply because she saw a presidential campaign unravel firsthand. Her political depth and understanding is, from what I have gathered, the same as any average Joe (pun intended) who watches an hour of CNN each week.

Her “great work” that captured a lot of attention for the Beast, entitled “My Beef with Ann Coulter,” is one of the biggest pieces of crap I’ve ever laid eyes on, and I say that with genuine conviction. What is worse than McCain’s grammatical inadequacies are her irrelevant jumps between subjects and self advancing my idea that her biggest concern is personal fame.

I don’t think Meghan McCain should be labeled a spokesperson for Generation Y because in my opinion, it’s embarrassing. We’re members of an over-qualified generation struggling to find jobs in a terrible economy, and a woman who has had virtually everything handed to her thinks she can represent us? It makes no sense.

Despite my irritation and resentment – or perhaps to add to it – I’m sure I will read Meghan McCain’s memoir, “Dirty Sexy Politics,” when it starts taking up shelf space on Aug. 31, so expect a review of it in the weeks to come. The anticipation has been killing me, especially when I saw a July 21 Twitter post that read, “wait to read it people, I wouldn’t have titled it “Dirty Sexy Politics” if there weren’t dirty, sexy things inside :-) .”

Yep, Meghan McCain is definitely the mastermind I’d love to see representing my demographic so that the rest of the nation can look on and think, “Wow, Generation Y is the idiot boom.”

Jennifer Orr I'm a print journalism major finishing up at Suffolk University in Boston. I'm the special projects editor here at TNGG and opinion editor of the Suffolk Journal. I try to model my writing after the New Journalism style because I think it is the most captivating way to deliver and receive news in print. Gay Talese is my hero. Future goals: work for a great publication and make some documentaries. Twitter: @Jennorr27

View all posts by Jennifer Orr

5 Responses to “Meet the New Maverick”

  1. Alex Pearlman

    I dunno… This is kinda harsh, although you have a point. But Meghan McCain is not as stupid as she looks, and certainly not as bad a spokeswoman as, say, someone like Bristol Palin.

    I like the girl. I don’t know why, she is kind of ditzy, but I think she’s fun and fresh and I’m glad she’s speaking up for what she thinks while maintaining her card-carrying Republican status. I think she will only do good things for the party if Republicans start listening to what she has to say.

    I mean, she’s pro-gay marriage, she’s pro-choice, and she talks shit about Karl Rove. All good things!

    Reply
  2. Meghan Flynn

    The thing is, even John McCain’s daughter couldn’t make a splash calling herself a libertarian. When she’s a Republican, it’s scandalous, exciting, etc. I’m excited that a politically savy woman has a platform to say things I agree with: liberal social views but conservative economic views. Which is what I think a Republican should be in the first place, not the tea-partying, evangelicals.

    Combining America’s fascination with things dirty and sexy with, what I think are, smart politics might not be very noble, but maybe it’ll get the job done?

    Reply
  3. Jessica

    I actually like how Meghan McCain associates herself with many Republican values, but isn’t afraid to stand behind socially liberal issues such as gay marriage and abortion.

    When you really stop and take a look at all the crap spewing out of politicians’ mouths, Meghan McCain doesn’t look so bad. Rather than stubbornly resisting something just because it’s not in line with the beliefs of a staunch Republican, she focuses on the values that truly matter to her. I don’t think she comes across as stupid; in fact, I think she illustrates an element of reasonable, productive bipartisanship that most *real* politicians could benefit from.

    Reply
  4. Jennifer Orr

    Thanks for the comments. I do agree that Meghan McCain is something different in the political/media world, but is she really worth all of the fuss? It was not my intention to make her seem stupid (because she is a knowledgeable and opinionated woman); instead it was to question why she, of all people, is being called a political commentator representing a generation.

    I have similar social views as McCain and I applaud her for boldly disagreeing with some of the biggest jerks in media and politics. But does having liberal views and a distaste for Karl Rove and an ability to write sub-par articles qualify me as a political commentator of Generation Y? No way! I will be the first to say that I do not know nearly enough to have the audacity to call myself a spokeswoman or political commentator. I’m a journalism student. I write on many topics. I am not a political commentator.

    McCain was an art history major. She is not a political commentator. She is a young woman saying the exact same thing as many other Millenials.

    We all can’t start calling ourselves spokespersons and commentators simply because we have cameras and microphones in our faces. That would be like Lindsay Lohan reading the New York Times while in jail, learning a thing or two about politics, and then calling herself a political commentator when she gets out and the press hounds her. It’s silly.

    Reply
    • Jessica

      I totally see where you’re coming from, and I agree, her genetics shouldn’t automatically give her the title of political commentator.

      Reply

Leave a Reply