emPATHETIC

Raise your hand if you love failblog, failbook, FMyLife or any other kind of “fail” website. Keep them up if you secretly snicker when a trending topic on Twitter is spelled wrong or when someone’s Facebook status says, “Worst. Day. Ever. Fell down dtairs and found out my boyfreind cheated on me.”

"The three words that best describe you are as follows, and I quote..."

“Learn to spell, emo kid, LOL!” you scoff, smirking at yourself in the reflective glow of your MacBook. You give your hair a final self-satisfied pat, then idly reach for another handful of Gummi Worms. You let them dangle dejectedly from your mouth as you chew haphazardly, continuing to gloat over your peers collective misfortunes as they spill onto your newsfeed — the digital-age version of the Trail of Tears. Safe behind your computer screen, you’re untouchable.

What’s that? This can’t be you. You don’t even like Gummi Worms! You would never be so needlessly hard-hearted. Don’t lower your hand now, we’ve all done it and there’s a reason why:

According to a study from the University of Michigan, Gen Y is the least empathetic generation, well — ever. It’s because the people we interact with on a daily basis are not necessarily people we actually see, you know, like, IRL. A majority of our “human” interactions come from commenting, liking, tweeting or texting. All of these technological mediums cause vocal inflection, facial expression and actual empathetic connections to be lost in a vortex of irrelevancy.

When I first read this study I didn’t (want) to believe it. I generally pride myself on being a generous and compassionate person and I didn’t want to admit that the Internet and social media has reduced my generation to a group of callous, cold-hearted cyborgs. “Nah, that’s not me. I must be in the minority,” I said to myself dismissing this clearly crack theory.

But then I turned on my computer.

I sat sifting through handfuls of tweets about the freed Chilean miners, clicking on various tiny-urls, my eyes, dull and emotionless, reflecting image after image of sheer joy, relief, gratitude; months of strength and resilience dissolving in a momentary lapse of teary-eyed catharsis. As I restlessly skimmed through photo after photo, I realized I felt…nothing. I could blame this on “American privilege,” — being so far removed from the Chilean disaster that it didn’t even seem real to me, but that feels like a poor excuse.

For some reason, we are able to “bond” with reality stars over the most superficial issues (Omigawd, Snooki loves pickles? So do I!! BFF!), but when something truly devastating happens we can’t make ourselves form an empathetic connection. We have been inundated with news about these miners from virtually every media angle for months. As happy as I was that they were finally rescued, I just couldn’t make myself feel.

Look at our everyday lives. Let’s take my earlier Facebook example. Someone posts (spelled correctly this time), “Worst. Day. Ever. Fell down stairs and found out my boyfriend cheated on me.” What’s our response? Usually a halfhearted, slightly-snarky “haha, j/k” or a distracted “aww, lol.”

A “j/k” or a “lol” do not empathy make. Etymologically, “empathy” means “in feeling,” with someone else. In tandem feelings–simply, you can put yourself in their shoes, be they Louboutins or half a pair of piss-yellow crocks some homeless guy salvaged from a dumpster.

We’re so busy trying to achieve our dreams, move out of our parents’ basements and pay off student loans that we have an “every man for himself” mentality. We’re (literally) offspring of the “peace and love” generation, so why can’t we literal love children feel someone else’s pain? Because it would kill our buzz and cramp our style. We put the “pathetic” in “empathetic”– we’re proving everything our parents’ generation thinks about us to be correct. Ask us if we care!

There’s no app for empathy, kids. We need to tear ourselves away from the self-involved Internet love affairs we have with ourselves and get right. Invest in one of those adorable baby/puppy calendars, and find a path back to pathos.

Caitlin Tremblay I work at Thomson Reuters in NYC and I'm a 2011 graduate of Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. I could live off of Ring Pops and cucumbers and I still pay for music. I think tattoos, Chuck Klosterman, Rolling Stone, red pens, day planners and Shakespeare are rad. You can find me on Twitter (@CTrembz).

View all posts by Caitlin Tremblay

5 Responses to “emPATHETIC”

  1. Amber

    I love this piece! The first couple paragraphs is exactly what I do on a fairly regular basis, minus the gummi worms. I think part of the reason people in our generation don’t show empathy though might be because of the medium itself – not that we can’t feel it. Sometimes I can’t bring myself to give a sincere response to emotional things online, mostly because I don’t think people should air their dirty laundry via status update and partially because even if I am sincere, emotion can be hard to convey in the typed word, so I worry it will be taken to be dripping with sarcasm. Plus, it’s easy to ignore it when you’re sure one of their other 2573 friends will give some virtual support. But if someone came to me in person, the empathy would be hard to ignore. Either way, people who are in need of some empathy are the ones who should leave their computer and search for some person to person contact. People scoff at those statuses because they come off as whiny, needy and annoying. Let’s face it – a lot of friends online are more like acquaintances and don’t want a constant newsfeed invite to your virtual pity party.

    Reply

Leave a Reply